[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af04bed9-ce2c-ee8d-f322-f3e33c1f6a49@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:07:49 -0700
From: Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Optimise put_pages_list()
On 10/8/21 7:17 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:35:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 21:55:21 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>>> My first response is an appeal to authority -- release_pages() does
>>> this same thing. Only it takes an array, constructs a list and passes
>>> that to put_unref_page_list(). So if that's slower (and lists _are_
>>> slower than arrays), we should have a put_unref_page_array().
>> And put_unref_page_list() does two passes across the list!
>>
>> <quietly sobs>
>>
>> Here is my beautiful release_pages(), as disrtibuted in linux-2.5.33:
> I think that looks much better!
>
>> I guess the current version is some commentary on the aging process?
> I blame the guy who sent cc59850ef940 to Linus back in 2011 ...
>
> I think Anthony was going to look into this and perhaps revert us to
> a pagevec_free() interface.
Sorry for not responding sooner. I have some cycles so I'll take a look
at this now.
Anthony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists