linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] kasan: add kasan mode messages when kasan init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:29:09 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        chinwen.chang@...iatek.com, yee.lee@...iatek.com,
        nicholas.tang@...iatek.com, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kasan: add kasan mode messages when kasan init

On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:58:26 +0200 Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 11:48, Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are multiple kasan modes. It makes sense that we add some messages
> > to know which kasan mode is when booting up. see [1].
> >
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212195 [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@...iatek.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Because this is rebased on the changes in the arm64 tree, and also
> touches arch/arm64, it probably has to go through the arm64 tree.

That would be OK, as long as it doesn't also have dependencies on
pending changes elsewhere in the -mm tree.

To solve both potential problems, I've queued it in -mm's
post-linux-next section, so it gets sent to Linus after both -mm and
arm have merged up.