[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e25f2c0-d9d3-475d-e973-63be1891f9a5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:21:44 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] iommu: Move IOMMU pagesize check to attach_device
On 2021/10/20 0:37, Sven Peter via iommu wrote:
> The iova allocator is capable of handling any granularity which is a power
> of two. Remove the much stronger condition that the granularity must be
> smaller or equal to the CPU page size from a BUG_ON there.
> Instead, check this condition during __iommu_attach_device and fail
> gracefully.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Peter<sven@...npeter.dev>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index dd7863e453a5..28896739964b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static struct iommu_domain *__iommu_domain_alloc(struct bus_type *bus,
> unsigned type);
> static int __iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev);
> +static void __iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev);
> static int __iommu_attach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct iommu_group *group);
> static void __iommu_detach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> @@ -1974,6 +1976,19 @@ void iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_free);
>
> +static int iommu_check_page_size(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> +{
> + if (!iommu_is_paging_domain(domain))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!(domain->pgsize_bitmap & (PAGE_SIZE | (PAGE_SIZE - 1)))) {
> + pr_warn("IOMMU pages cannot exactly represent CPU pages.\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -1983,9 +1998,23 @@ static int __iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> return -ENODEV;
>
> ret = domain->ops->attach_dev(domain, dev);
> - if (!ret)
> - trace_attach_device_to_domain(dev);
> - return ret;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check that CPU pages can be represented by the IOVA granularity.
> + * This has to be done after ops->attach_dev since many IOMMU drivers
> + * only limit domain->pgsize_bitmap after having attached the first
> + * device.
> + */
> + ret = iommu_check_page_size(domain);
> + if (ret) {
> + __iommu_detach_device(domain, dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
It looks odd. __iommu_attach_device() attaches an I/O page table for a
device. How does it relate to CPU pages? Why is it a failure case if CPU
page size is not covered?
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists