[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YW+q1yQ8MuhHINAs@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:36:23 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:20:13PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
>
> On 2021/10/20 2:14, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > I think it is set to HZ currently, though I haven't tried big
> > > transfers but I still get into some issues with Qemu based stuff.
> > > Maybe we can bump it up to few seconds :)
> > If you use adapter->timeout, this can even be set at runtime using a
> > ioctl. So, it can adapt to use cases. Of course, the driver should
> > initialize it to a sane default if the automatic default (HZ) is not
> > suitable.
>
>
> I think a big value may solve most cases. but the driver never know how big
> is enough by static configuration.
>
> Can we make this value to be configurable, just let the other side provide
> this value ?
If an ioctl can change it, that would mean it is configurable, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists