[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211020074836.42476792@sal.lan>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:48:36 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Patrik Gfeller <patrik.gfeller@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG 0/5] bug reports for atomisp to make it work
Em Mon, 18 Oct 2021 01:23:31 +0900
Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com> escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> These mails contain RFC patches, which are almost bug report and some
> are just bug report, for atomisp to work (again). Tested on Microsoft
> Surface 3 (Windows) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 (Android model) with v5.15-rc5.
> Both are Cherry Trail (ISP2401) devices.
Before start looking at the patches, let me check if I got it right:
Should this series be applied after the series you sent earlier[1]?
[1] The series which starts with this one:
[PATCH 00/17] various fixes for atomisp to make it work
Regards,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists