linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/17] various fixes for atomisp to make it work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211020075015.316d827c@sal.lan>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:50:15 +0100
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Patrik Gfeller <patrik.gfeller@...il.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Aline Santana Cordeiro <alinesantanacordeiro@...il.com>,
        Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
        Alan <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] various fixes for atomisp to make it work

Em Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:56:40 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> escreveu:

> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:45 AM Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series contains fixes for atomisp to work (again). Tested on
> > Microsoft Surface 3 (Windows) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 (Android model) with
> > v5.15-rc5. Both are Cherry Trail (ISP2401) devices.
> >
> > I'm still not used to Linux patch sending flow. Sorry in advance
> > if there is some weirdness :-) but I did my best.  
> 
> I agree with Hans, you did an excellent job!
> I will try to find time to look into this. In any case it seems to me
> that this is a material more likely for v5.17-rc1, rather than v5.16.

Yeah, it sounds to late to apply it for 5.16.

Regards,
Mauro