[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7376a28e-ac8d-06d0-fa05-81656cd3a994@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:21:30 +0800
From: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: sjpark@...zon.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/dbgfs: Add adaptive_targets list check
before enable monitor_on
On 2021/10/19 下午11:42, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hello Xin,
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 22:26:04 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> When the ctx->adaptive_targets list is empty,
>> i did some test on monitor_on interface like this.
> s/i/I/
thanks
>> echo on > /sys/kernel/debug/damon/monitor_on
>> [ 851.988307] damon: kdamond (5390) starts
> Could you please add four spaces in the beginning of this example terminal
> outputs? Also, I think confirming targets are empty like below before writing
> 'on' could make this example better.
>
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/damon/target_ids
> #
>
> or, like below.
>
> # echo > /sys/kernel/debug/damon/target_ids
Oh! thank you so much, i will fix it.
>
>> Though the ctx->adaptive_targets list is empty, but the
>> kthread_run still be called, and the kdamond.x thread still
>> be created, this is meaningless.
>>
>> So there adds a judgment in 'dbgfs_monitor_on_write',
>> if the ctx->adaptive_targets list is empty, return -EINVAL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/damon.h | 1 +
>> mm/damon/core.c | 5 +++++
>> mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
>> index 715dadd21f7c..06acf73fe9db 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
>> @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ void damon_destroy_scheme(struct damos *s);
>>
>> struct damon_target *damon_new_target(unsigned long id);
>> void damon_add_target(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t);
>> +int damon_target_empty(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> Seems 'bool' would be better for the return type?
ok!
>
>> void damon_free_target(struct damon_target *t);
>> void damon_destroy_target(struct damon_target *t);
>> unsigned int damon_nr_regions(struct damon_target *t);
>> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
>> index 2f6785737902..c651b49249e5 100644
>> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
>> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
>> @@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ void damon_add_target(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t)
>> list_add_tail(&t->list, &ctx->adaptive_targets);
>> }
>>
>> +int damon_target_empty(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> + return list_empty(&ctx->adaptive_targets);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void damon_del_target(struct damon_target *t)
>> {
>> list_del(&t->list);
>> diff --git a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c
>> index 38188347d8ab..bac42dd358d1 100644
>> --- a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c
>> +++ b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c
>> @@ -865,9 +865,15 @@ static ssize_t dbgfs_monitor_on_write(struct file *file,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!strncmp(kbuf, "on", count))
>> + if (!strncmp(kbuf, "on", count)) {
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < dbgfs_nr_ctxs; i++) {
>> + if (damon_target_empty(dbgfs_ctxs[i]))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> err = damon_start(dbgfs_ctxs, dbgfs_nr_ctxs);
>> - else if (!strncmp(kbuf, "off", count))
>> + } else if (!strncmp(kbuf, "off", count))
>> err = damon_stop(dbgfs_ctxs, dbgfs_nr_ctxs);
>> else
>> err = -EINVAL;
> Please use braces for all above branches:
Ok,i will correct it.
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-style.html#placing-braces-and-spaces
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
>> --
>> 2.31.0
--
Best Regards!
Xin Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists