[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tuhcnlwt.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:24:50 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] irqchip: Provide platform_device to of_irq_init_cb_t
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:23:52 +0100,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:43 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip.h b/include/linux/irqchip.h
> > index ccf32758ea85..146a9d80a6a2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/irqchip.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irqchip.h
> > @@ -33,7 +33,15 @@ extern int platform_irqchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > #define IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN(drv_name) \
> > static const struct of_device_id drv_name##_irqchip_match_table[] = {
> >
> > -#define IRQCHIP_MATCH(compat, fn) { .compatible = compat, .data = fn },
> > +/* Undefined on purpose */
> > +int typecheck_irq_init_cb(struct device_node *, struct device_node *,
> > + struct platform_device *);
> > +
> > +#define typecheck_irq_init_cb(fn) \
> > + __typecheck(typecheck_irq_init_cb, fn) ? fn : fn
>
> That's nice! Shouldn't it also be used for IRQCHIP_DECLARE?
Absolutely. And enabling this shows that changing of_irq_init_cb_t
breaks *all users* of IRQCHIP_DECLARE(). Not an acceptable outcome
when we're at -rc5.
Why can't the relevant drivers use of_find_device_by_node() instead?
That would allow us to keep the status-quo on of_irq_init_cb_t.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists