linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] workqueue: Introduce show_one_worker_pool and show_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 19:27:05 +1100
From:   Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     jiangshanlai@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        jirislaby@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, pavel@....cz,
        len.brown@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] workqueue: Introduce show_one_worker_pool and
 show_one_workqueue.

Hi Tejun,

On 20/10/21 5:41 am, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:20:07AM +1100, Imran Khan wrote:
>> Currently show_workqueue_state shows the state of all workqueues and of
>> all worker pools. In certain cases we may need to dump state of only a
>> specific workqueue or worker pool. For example in destroy_workqueue we
>> only need to show state of the workqueue which is getting destroyed.
>>
>> So rename show_workqueue_state to show_all_workqueues(to signify it
>> dumps state of all busy workqueues) and divide it into more granular
>> functions (show_one_workqueue and show_one_worker_pool), that would show
>> states of individual workqueues and worker pools and can be used in
>> cases such as the one mentioned above.
>>
>> Also, as mentioned earlier, make destroy_workqueue dump data pertaining
>> to only the workqueue that is being destroyed and make user(s) of
>> earlier interface(show_workqueue_state), use new interface
>> (show_all_workqueues).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
> 
> Can you respin the patch on top of the following branch?
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-5.16

Sure, I have rebased it upon the suggested branch and have sent v4 [1] 
of the change.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211020030900.321837-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com/

Thanks,
--Imran
> 
> Thank you.
>