[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211020110303.6f21c057@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:03:03 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: nand_bbt: hide suspend/resume
hooks while scanning bbt
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:01:32 +0200
Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:53:26AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:45:31 +0200
> > Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> > >
> > > The BBT scan logic use the MTD helpers before the MTD layer had a
> > > chance to initialize the device, and that leads to issues when
> > > accessing the uninitialized suspend lock. Let's temporarily set the
> > > suspend/resume hooks to NULL to skip the lock acquire/release step.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 013e6292aaf5 ("mtd: rawnand: Simplify the locking")
> > > Tested-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
> >
> > It's missing our Signed-off-by tags.
> >
>
> Patch is from you ;)
> If you are okay with it, I will add your Signed-off-by tag.
You should add both (mine and yours).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists