linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: virtio: fix completion handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211020091721.7kcihpevzf7h4d62@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:47:21 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>
Cc:     Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>, wsa@...nel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: virtio: fix completion handling

On 20-10-21, 16:54, Jie Deng wrote:
> 
> On 2021/10/19 16:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 19-10-21, 09:46, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > >   static void virtio_i2c_msg_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > >   {
> > > -	struct virtio_i2c *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> > > +	struct virtio_i2c_req *req;
> > > +	unsigned int len;
> > > -	complete(&vi->completion);
> > > +	while ((req = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)))
> > > +		complete(&req->completion);
> > Instead of adding a completion for each request and using only the
> > last one, maybe we can do this instead here:
> > 
> > 	while ((req = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len))) {
> >                  if (req->out_hdr.flags == cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_I2C_FLAGS_FAIL_NEXT))
> 
> 
> Is this for the last one check ? For the last one, this bit should be
> cleared, right ?

Oops, you are right. This should be `!=` instead. Thanks.

-- 
viresh