linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: s5p-sss - Add error handling in s5p_aes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXAHxNWkttb0V6BV@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:12:52 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, vz@...ia.com,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: s5p-sss - Add error handling in
 s5p_aes_probe()

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:06:24PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
> The function s5p_aes_probe() does not perform sufficient error
> checking after executing platform_get_resource(), thus fix it.
> 
> Fixes: c2afad6c6105 ("crypto: s5p-sss - Add HASH support for Exynos")
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1
>  - add fixed title
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> index 55aa3a711..7717e9e59 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
> @@ -2171,6 +2171,8 @@ static int s5p_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	variant = find_s5p_sss_version(pdev);
>  	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Note: HASH and PRNG uses the same registers in secss, avoid
> -- 
> 2.20.1.windows.1
> 
> 
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>