linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] tracing: Add division and multiplication support for hist triggers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:23:31 -0700
From:   Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] tracing: Add division and multiplication support
 for hist triggers

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:13 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 07:54:59 -0700
> Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it worth adding something like this for the multiplication case as well?
>
> No, multiplication is a pretty fast operation, and the added branches to
> test would cause more overhead than what you would save. But, division is a
> very slow operation, and I believe that even with the extra branches it
> would still help.
>
> If we do this, it should be a separate patch anyway, where we can actual do
> measurements to see if there was an improvement, and revert if not.

Sounds good. Thanks for the clarification Steve.

- Kalesh

>
> -- Steve