linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: doc: Call out the non-reentrance conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:18:18 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: doc: Call out the non-reentrance conditions

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 01:40:21PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> * A work item instance will not be processed by multiple workers at the
>   same time, i.e. it's non-reentrant, so requeuing the same instance of
>   a work item is safe and not racy.  Operations considered as changing
>   the work item to a different instance are: 1) change the work
>   function, 2) queue the work item to a different workqueue, or 3)
>   reinitiate the work item.  The non-reentrance guarantee doesn't hold
>   for different work item instances.

Yeah, I prefer it to be described this way but it's not a strong opinion.
Looks good to me either way.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun