[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXBBpdrxcGEfdESC@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:19:49 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
Cc: jiangshanlai@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, pavel@....cz,
len.brown@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] workqueue: Introduce show_one_worker_pool and
show_one_workqueue.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:09:00PM +1100, Imran Khan wrote:
> Currently show_workqueue_state shows the state of all workqueues and of
> all worker pools. In certain cases we may need to dump state of only a
> specific workqueue or worker pool. For example in destroy_workqueue we
> only need to show state of the workqueue which is getting destroyed.
>
> So rename show_workqueue_state to show_all_workqueues(to signify it
> dumps state of all busy workqueues) and divide it into more granular
> functions (show_one_workqueue and show_one_worker_pool), that would show
> states of individual workqueues and worker pools and can be used in
> cases such as the one mentioned above.
>
> Also, as mentioned earlier, make destroy_workqueue dump data pertaining
> to only the workqueue that is being destroyed and make user(s) of
> earlier interface(show_workqueue_state), use new interface
> (show_all_workqueues).
>
> Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
Applied to wq/for-5.16.
Thank you.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists