| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+=V6c1N8d6bB_2xKHjhygg_+45Grj9J2Z5UrdQAt6gDOtO=yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 17:40:23 -0700
From: Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>
To: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vasyl Vavrychuk <Vasyl.Vavrychuk@...nsynergy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] iio/scmi: Add reading "raw" attribute.
Hi Andriy,
Technically, the changes look good to me.
Thanks,
Jyoti
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:57 AM Andriy Tryshnivskyy
<andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 20.10.21 20:51, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
> > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:59:49 +0300
> > Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW to the mask and implement corresponding
> >> reading "raw" attribute in scmi_iio_read_raw.
> >> Introduce new type IIO_VAL_INT_64 to read 64-bit value
> >> for "raw" attribute.
> >>
> > Change log needs to be below the --- otherwise we'll store it forever
> > in git. A linked tag (which will be generated when I apply)
> > is sufficient for this sort of historical info.
> >
> Sorry, this is my first patch, I was not aware of that.
> Thanks for the explanation.
> Quick question: since next version will include 2 patches,
> I guess a change log should be moved back to the cover letter, right?
>
>
> >> Changes comparing v5 -> v6:
> >> * revert v5 changes since with scmi_iio_read_raw() the channel
> >> can't be used by in kernel users (iio-hwmon)
> >> * returned to v3 with direct mode
> >> * introduce new type IIO_VAL_INT_64 to read 64-bit value
> >>
> >> Changes comparing v4 -> v5:
> >> * call iio_device_release_direct_mode() on error
> >> * code cleanup, fix typo
> >>
> >> Changes comparing v3 -> v4:
> >> * do not use scmi_iio_get_raw() for reading raw attribute due to 32-bit
> >> return value limitation (actually I reverted the previous v3)
> >> * introduce scmi_iio_read_raw to scmi_iio_ext_info[] which can return
> >> 64-bit value
> >> * enabling/disabling and reading raw attribute is done in direct mode
> >>
> >> Changes comparing v2 -> v3:
> >> * adaptation for changes in structure scmi_iio_priv (no member
> >> named 'handle')
> >>
> >> Changes comparing v0 -> v2:
> >> * added an error return when the error happened during config_set
> >> * removed redundant cast for "readings"
> >> * added check if raw value fits 32 bits
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 3 ++
> >> include/linux/iio/types.h | 1 +
> > Two patches needed. One to introduce the new core functionality then
> > a second to use it in the driver.
> >
> > Actual code looks good to me though I think I'd like a comment next to
> > the #define as not obvious which way around the two parts will go.
> >
> > There are some other places we will probably need to ultimately handle this
> > to allow for in kernel consumers but those can come when someone needs them.
> >
> > Will need an ack from Jyoti on this one though as driver author.
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> Sure, will split the current patch into two patches.
>
>
> >> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c b/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> >> index 7cf2bf282cef..2c1aec0fd5ff 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> >> @@ -279,6 +279,52 @@ static int scmi_iio_get_odr_val(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int *val, int *val2)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int scmi_iio_read_channel_data(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >> + struct iio_chan_spec const *ch, int *val, int *val2)
> >> +{
> >> + struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> >> + u32 sensor_config;
> >> + struct scmi_sensor_reading readings[SCMI_IIO_NUM_OF_AXIS];
> >> + int err;
> >> +
> >> + sensor_config = FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLED_MASK,
> >> + SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLE);
> >> + err = sensor->sensor_ops->config_set(
> >> + sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id, sensor_config);
> >> + if (err) {
> >> + dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> >> + "Error in enabling sensor %s err %d",
> >> + sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> >> + return err;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + err = sensor->sensor_ops->reading_get_timestamped(
> >> + sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> >> + sensor->sensor_info->num_axis, readings);
> >> + if (err) {
> >> + dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> >> + "Error in reading raw attribute for sensor %s err %d",
> >> + sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> >> + return err;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + sensor_config = FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLED_MASK,
> >> + SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_DISABLE);
> >> + err = sensor->sensor_ops->config_set(
> >> + sensor->ph, sensor->sensor_info->id, sensor_config);
> >> + if (err) {
> >> + dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> >> + "Error in disabling sensor %s err %d",
> >> + sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> >> + return err;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + *val = (u32)readings[ch->scan_index].value;
> >> + *val2 = (u32)(readings[ch->scan_index].value >> 32)
> >> +
> >> + return IIO_VAL_INT_64;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int scmi_iio_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >> struct iio_chan_spec const *ch, int *val,
> >> int *val2, long mask)
> >> @@ -300,6 +346,14 @@ static int scmi_iio_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> >> ret = scmi_iio_get_odr_val(iio_dev, val, val2);
> >> return ret ? ret : IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> >> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> >> + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(iio_dev);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = scmi_iio_read_channel_data(iio_dev, ch, val, val2);
> >> + iio_device_release_direct_mode(iio_dev);
> >> + return ret;
> >> default:
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> @@ -381,7 +435,8 @@ static void scmi_iio_set_data_channel(struct iio_chan_spec *iio_chan,
> >> iio_chan->type = type;
> >> iio_chan->modified = 1;
> >> iio_chan->channel2 = mod;
> >> - iio_chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> >> + iio_chan->info_mask_separate =
> >> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> >> iio_chan->info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> >> iio_chan->info_mask_shared_by_type_available =
> >> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> >> index 6d2175eb7af2..49e42d04ea16 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> >> @@ -702,6 +702,9 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *buf, size_t offset, unsigned int type,
> >> }
> >> case IIO_VAL_CHAR:
> >> return sysfs_emit_at(buf, offset, "%c", (char)vals[0]);
> >> + case IIO_VAL_INT_64:
> >> + tmp2 = (s64)((((u64)vals[1]) << 32) | (u32)vals[0]);
> >> + return sysfs_emit_at(buf, offset, "%lld", tmp2);
> >> default:
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/types.h b/include/linux/iio/types.h
> >> index 84b3f8175cc6..e148fe11a3dc 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/iio/types.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/iio/types.h
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum iio_event_info {
> >> #define IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO 3
> >> #define IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB 4
> >> #define IIO_VAL_INT_MULTIPLE 5
> >> +#define IIO_VAL_INT_64 6
> > Possibly worth a descriptive comment. The other
> > types tend to make it easy to assume the role
> > of val and that of val2, in this case, val being
> > the lower 32 bits isn't obvious...
>
> I will add a comment here.
>
> Thank you for your review!
>
> Best regard,
> Andriy.
>
>
> >> #define IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL 10
> >> #define IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 11
> >> #define IIO_VAL_CHAR 12
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists