[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202110210934.E84B977268@keescook>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:34:58 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] signal/sparc32: In setup_rt_frame and setup_fram
use force_fatal_sig
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:44:02PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Modify the 32bit version of setup_rt_frame and setup_frame to act
> similar to the 64bit version of setup_rt_frame and fail with a signal
> instead of calling do_exit.
>
> Replacing do_exit(SIGILL) with force_fatal_signal(SIGILL) ensures that
> the process will be terminated cleanly when the stack frame is
> invalid, instead of just killing off a single thread and leaving the
> process is a weird state.
>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Nicely already had the return path written. :)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists