linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Fix a resource leak in the remove function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211021174104.GA3562838@p14s>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:41:04 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, hongxing.zhu@....com, peng.fan@....com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Fix a resource leak in the remove
 function

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:44:28AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'priv->workqueue' is destroyed in the error handling path of the probe but
> not in the remove function.
> 
> Add the missing call to release some resources.
> 
> Fixes: 2df7062002d0 ("remoteproc: imx_proc: enable virtio/mailbox")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is speculative. I'm not sure if the added function call is at
> the right place in the remove function.
> Review with care.
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index ff8170dbbc3c..0a45bc0d3f73 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -804,6 +804,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
>  	rproc_del(rproc);
>  	imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> +	destroy_workqueue(priv->workqueue);

This seems to be the right thing to do. Peng - please review and test on your
side.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  	rproc_free(rproc);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>