[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211021183935.GA9071@fuller.cnet>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:39:35 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: gor@...ux.ibm.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org,
mbenes@...e.cz, pmladek@...e.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 11/11] context_tracking,x86: Fix text_poke_sync()
vs NOHZ_FULL
Peter,
static __always_inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode(void)
{
mds_user_clear_cpu_buffers();
}
/**
* mds_user_clear_cpu_buffers - Mitigation for MDS and TAA vulnerability
*
* Clear CPU buffers if the corresponding static key is enabled
*/
static __always_inline void mds_user_clear_cpu_buffers(void)
{
if (static_branch_likely(&mds_user_clear))
mds_clear_cpu_buffers();
}
We were discussing how to perform objtool style validation
that no code after the check for
> + /* NMI happens here and must still do/finish CT_WORK_n */
> + sync_core();
But after the discussion with you, it seems doing the TLB checking
and (also sync_core) checking very late/very early on exit/entry
makes things easier to review.
Can then use a single atomic variable with USER/KERNEL state and cmpxchg
loops.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 05:17:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Use the new context_tracking infrastructure to avoid disturbing
> userspace tasks when we rewrite kernel code.
>
> XXX re-audit the entry code to make sure only the context_tracking
> static_branch is before hitting this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 8 +++++++-
> include/linux/context_tracking.h | 1 +
> kernel/context_tracking.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sync_core.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ static inline void sync_core(void)
> */
> iret_to_self();
> }
> +#define sync_core sync_core
> +
>
> /*
> * Ensure that a core serializing instruction is issued before returning
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/mmu_context.h>
> #include <linux/bsearch.h>
> #include <linux/sync_core.h>
> +#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
> #include <asm/text-patching.h>
> #include <asm/alternative.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -924,9 +925,14 @@ static void do_sync_core(void *info)
> sync_core();
> }
>
> +static bool do_sync_core_cond(int cpu, void *info)
> +{
> + return !context_tracking_set_cpu_work(cpu, CT_WORK_SYNC);
> +}
> +
> void text_poke_sync(void)
> {
> - on_each_cpu(do_sync_core, NULL, 1);
> + on_each_cpu_cond(do_sync_core_cond, do_sync_core, NULL, 1);
> }
>
> struct text_poke_loc {
> --- a/include/linux/context_tracking.h
> +++ b/include/linux/context_tracking.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>
> enum ct_work {
> CT_WORK_KLP = 1,
> + CT_WORK_SYNC = 2,
> };
>
> /*
> --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c
> +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ static __always_inline void context_trac
> __this_cpu_dec(context_tracking.recursion);
> }
>
> +#ifndef sync_core
> +static inline void sync_core(void) { }
> +#endif
> +
> /* CT_WORK_n, must be noinstr, non-blocking, NMI safe and deal with spurious calls */
> static noinstr void ct_exit_user_work(struct context_tracking *ct)
> {
> @@ -64,6 +68,14 @@ static noinstr void ct_exit_user_work(struct
> arch_atomic_andnot(CT_WORK_KLP, &ct->work);
> }
>
> + if (work & CT_WORK_SYNC) {
> + /* NMI happens here and must still do/finish CT_WORK_n */
> + sync_core();
> +
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> + arch_atomic_andnot(CT_WORK_SYNC, &ct->work);
> + }
> +
> smp_mb__before_atomic();
> arch_atomic_andnot(CT_SEQ_WORK, &ct->seq);
> }
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists