[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5msO7-QCXv6JQj2Tado9ZoWAHRkgq6-En18PeKSXFDdBLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 18:15:49 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@...il.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/67] fscache: Rewrite index API and management system
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 5:21 PM Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:50:15PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> However, with the advent of the tmpfile capacity in the VFS, an opportunity
> arises to do invalidation much more easily, without having to wait for I/O
> that's actually in progress: Cachefiles can simply cut over its file
> pointer for the backing object attached to a cookie and abandon the
> in-progress I/O, dismissing it upon completion.
Have changes been made to O_TMPFILE? It is problematic for network filesystems
because it is not an atomic operation, and would be great if it were possible
to create a tmpfile and open it atomically (at the file system level).
Currently it results in creating a tmpfile (which results in
opencreate then close)
immediately followed by reopening the tmpfile which is somewhat counter to
the whole idea of a tmpfile (ie that it is deleted when closed) since
the syscall results
in two opens ie open(create)/close/open/close
--
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists