linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHV2 1/3] KVM: x86: introduce kvm_mmu_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXDeRej39voc7lJU@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:28:05 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHV2 1/3] KVM: x86: introduce kvm_mmu_pte_prefetch structure

On (21/10/21 11:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> 
> We are using TDP. And somehow I never see (literally never) async PFs.
> It's always either hva_to_pfn_fast() or hva_to_pfn_slow() or
> __direct_map() from tdp_page_fault().

Hmm, and tdp_page_fault()->fast_page_fault() always fails on
!is_access_allowed(error_code, new_spte), it never handles the faults.
And I see some ->mmu_lock contention:

	spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
	__direct_map();
	spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);

So it might be that we setup guest memory wrongly and never get
advantages of TPD and fast page faults?