[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0f51171-2a8b-b931-eb98-63e92fdf9dee@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:58:53 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: fix pm runtime unbalance in
tegra_adma_remove
On 21/10/2021 04:14, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> Since pm_runtime_put is done when tegra_adma_probe is successful, we
> cannot do pm_runtime_put_sync again in tegra_adma_remove.
>
> Fix this by removing the pm_runtime_put_sync in tegra_adma_remove.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> index b1115a6d1935..7e4d40cd9577 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> @@ -940,7 +940,6 @@ static int tegra_adma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> for (i = 0; i < tdma->nr_channels; ++i)
> irq_dispose_mapping(tdma->channels[i].irq);
>
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>
> return 0;
>
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists