linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: rcar_fdp1: Fix the correct variable assignments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <163480732348.2663858.5189176300885425535@Monstersaurus>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:08:43 +0100
From:   Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rcar_fdp1: Fix the correct variable assignments

Hi Tang,

Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2021-10-21 08:59:18)
> Hi Tang,
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 5:10 AM Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> > In the function fdp1_probe(), when get irq failed, the
> > function platform_get_irq() log an error message, so
> > remove redundant message here. And the variable type
> > of "ret" is int, the "fdp1->irq" is unsigned int, when
> > irq failed, this place maybe wrong, thus fix it.
> 
> The second issue is not actually present, as the error check
> operates on ret, not fdp1->irq?

Agreed, the error print is redundant. 

In fact it would have erroneously print on ret=-EPROBE_DEFER cases too,
so it's not just redundant, but inaccurate too.

I don't think the assignment of fdp1->irq = ret at the same time is an
issue, because if ret < 0, fdp1->irq wouldn't ever get read, as the call
returns.

But .. I have no objection to setting it after instead.

> > Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> 
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar_fdp1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar_fdp1.c
> > @@ -2289,11 +2289,10 @@ static int fdp1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >                 return PTR_ERR(fdp1->regs);
> >
> >         /* Interrupt service routine registration */
> > -       fdp1->irq = ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > -       if (ret < 0) {
> > -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot find IRQ\n");
> > +       ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +       if (ret < 0)
> >                 return ret;
> > -       }
> > +       fdp1->irq = ret;
> >
> >         ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, fdp1->irq, fdp1_irq_handler, 0,
> >                                dev_name(&pdev->dev), fdp1);
> 
> Anyway, the code is correct, so:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Perhaps with the commit message updated/simplified, but either way:

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds