linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: r8188eu: use helper to check for broadcast address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f5657f12-e20e-5cd9-e872-32e294741e88@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:12:27 +0200
From:   Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To:     Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: r8188eu: use helper to check for broadcast
 address

On 10/20/21 23:07, Phillip Potter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 09:53:59PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
>> Use the is_broadcast_ether_addr function to check for a
>> broadcast address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 6 ++----
>>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/odm.c           | 3 +--
>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
>> index 995a0248c26f..b0dfafe526f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
>> @@ -392,13 +392,12 @@ void free_mlme_ext_priv(struct mlme_ext_priv *pmlmeext)
>>   
>>   static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_handler *ptable, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
>>   {
>> -	u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
>>   	u8 *pframe = precv_frame->rx_data;
>>   
>>   	if (ptable->func) {
>>   	/* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */
>>   		if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) &&
>> -		    memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN))
>> +		    !is_broadcast_ether_addr(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe)))

Hi Martin,

I'm not an expert regarding alignment. Is GetAddr1Ptr(pframe) always 
__aligned(2) as required by is_broadcast_ether_addr?

>>   			return;
>>   		ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame);
>>   	}
>> @@ -409,7 +408,6 @@ void mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
>>   	int index;
>>   	struct mlme_handler *ptable;
>>   	struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &padapter->mlmepriv;
>> -	u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
>>   	u8 *pframe = precv_frame->rx_data;
>>   	struct sta_info *psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, GetAddr2Ptr(pframe));
>>   
>> @@ -418,7 +416,7 @@ void mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_frame *precv_frame)
>>   
>>   	/* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */
>>   	if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) &&
>> -	    memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN))
>> +	    !is_broadcast_ether_addr(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe)))
>>   		return;

Same here.

>>   
>>   	ptable = mlme_sta_tbl;
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/odm.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/odm.c
>> index 67cf8f7baba5..21f115194df8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/odm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/odm.c
>> @@ -829,7 +829,6 @@ void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct odm_dm_struct *pDM_Odm)
>>   	u8	sta_cnt = 0;
>>   	u32 PWDB_rssi[NUM_STA] = {0};/* 0~15]:MACID, [16~31]:PWDB_rssi */
>>   	struct sta_info *psta;
>> -	u8 bcast_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
>>   
>>   	if (!(pDM_Odm->SupportAbility & ODM_BB_RSSI_MONITOR))
>>   		return;
>> @@ -841,7 +840,7 @@ void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct odm_dm_struct *pDM_Odm)
>>   		psta = pDM_Odm->pODM_StaInfo[i];
>>   		if (IS_STA_VALID(psta) &&
>>   		    (psta->state & WIFI_ASOC_STATE) &&
>> -		    memcmp(psta->hwaddr, bcast_addr, ETH_ALEN) &&
>> +		    !is_broadcast_ether_addr(psta->hwaddr) &&

Perhaps we should add __aligned(2) to the hwaddr variable in struct
sta_info to be safe?

u8	hwaddr[ETH_ALEN] __aligned(2);


>>   		    memcmp(psta->hwaddr, myid(&Adapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN)) {
>>   			if (psta->rssi_stat.UndecoratedSmoothedPWDB < tmpEntryMinPWDB)
>>   				tmpEntryMinPWDB = psta->rssi_stat.UndecoratedSmoothedPWDB;
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>>

Other than that the patch looks good, thanks.

Michael