[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXFOlKWUuwFUJxUZ@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:27:16 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, djwong@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
hch@...radead.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, willy@...radead.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dm,dax,pmem: prepare dax_copy_to/from_iter() APIs
with DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:10:57PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> Prepare dax_copy_to/from_iter() APIs with DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY flag
> such that when the flag is set, the underlying driver implementation
> of the APIs may deal with potential poison in a given address
> range and read partial data or write after clearing poison.
FYI, I've been wondering for a while if we could just kill off these
methods entirely. Basically the driver interaction consists of two
parts:
a) wether to use the flushcache/mcsafe variants of the generic helpers
b) actually doing remapping for device mapper
to me it seems like we should handle a) with flags in dax_operations,
and only have a remap callback for device mapper. That way we'd avoid
the indirect calls for the native case, and also avoid tons of
boilerplate code. "futher decouple DAX from block devices" series
already massages the device mapper into a form suitable for such
callbacks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists