linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: consolidate __ex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bd3419a3-b858-1a4d-a081-d09bbc56eaa7@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:38:41 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang3@...l.ustc.edu.cn>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
CC:     <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: consolidate __ex_table construction



On 2021/10/20 22:06, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> 
> Consolidate all the __ex_table constuction code with a _ASM_EXTABLE
> helper.
> 
> There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h   | 12 +++-------
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 40 +++++++++++---------------------
>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> index 1b00badb9f87..3191574e135c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -30,10 +30,7 @@
>   	"3:	li %[r],%[e]				\n"	\
>   	"	jump 2b,%[t]				\n"	\
>   	"	.previous				\n"	\
> -	"	.section __ex_table,\"a\"		\n"	\
> -	"	.balign " RISCV_SZPTR "			\n"	\
> -	"	" RISCV_PTR " 1b, 3b			\n"	\
> -	"	.previous				\n"	\
> +		_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b)				\
>   	: [r] "+r" (ret), [ov] "=&r" (oldval),			\
>   	  [u] "+m" (*uaddr), [t] "=&r" (tmp)			\
>   	: [op] "Jr" (oparg), [e] "i" (-EFAULT)			\
> @@ -103,11 +100,8 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *uaddr,
>   	"4:	li %[r],%[e]				\n"
>   	"	jump 3b,%[t]				\n"
>   	"	.previous				\n"
> -	"	.section __ex_table,\"a\"		\n"
> -	"	.balign " RISCV_SZPTR "			\n"
> -	"	" RISCV_PTR " 1b, 4b			\n"
> -	"	" RISCV_PTR " 2b, 4b			\n"
> -	"	.previous				\n"
> +		_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b)			\
> +		_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, 4b)			\
>   	: [r] "+r" (ret), [v] "=&r" (val), [u] "+m" (*uaddr), [t] "=&r" (tmp)
>   	: [ov] "Jr" (oldval), [nv] "Jr" (newval), [e] "i" (-EFAULT)
>   	: "memory");
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index f314ff44c48d..35802e72ace8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>   
>   #include <asm/pgtable.h>		/* for TASK_SIZE */
>   
> +#define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to)						\
> +	"	.pushsection	__ex_table, \"a\"\n"			\
> +	"	.balign "	RISCV_SZPTR "	 \n"			\
> +	"	" RISCV_PTR	"(" #from "), (" #to ")\n"		\
> +	"	.popsection\n"
> +

The jump_label mechanism could use this macro too,
see arch/riscv/include/asm/jump_label.h, maybe move the above into asm.h
and also do some replace in next patch ?

Question: the jump label use relative address, but why not trigger the 
Section mismatch issue?