[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXFgEzZw/AOJ7AnW@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:41:55 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Folios for 5.15 request - Was: re: Folio discussion recap -
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 02:35:32PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> My opinion after all the discussions: use a dedicate type with a clear
> name to solve the immediate filemap API issue. Leave the remainder alone
> for now. Less code to touch, less subsystems to involve (well, still a
> lot), less people to upset, less discussions to have, faster review,
> faster upstream, faster progress. A small but reasonable step.
I didn't change anything I didn't need to. File pages go onto the
LRU list, so I need to change the LRU code to handle arbitrary-sized
folios instead of pages which are either order-0 or order-9. Every
function that I convert in this patchset is either used by another
function in this patchset, or by the fs/iomap conversion that I have
staged for the next merge window after folios goes in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists