[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6b11c67ea495ed9d44f067622d852de4a510ce65.1634822969.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:30:52 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: kill extra rcu lock/unlock in queue enter
blk_try_enter_queue() already takes rcu_read_lock/unlock, so we can
avoid the second pair in percpu_ref_tryget_live(), use a newly added
percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu().
As rcu_read_lock/unlock imply barrier()s, it's pretty noticeable,
especially for for !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU (default for some distributions),
where __rcu_read_lock/unlock() are not inlined.
3.20% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
3.05% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_lock
2.52% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
2.28% io_uring [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __rcu_read_lock
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 88752e51d2b6..20e76aeb50f5 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_cleanup_queue);
static bool blk_try_enter_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool pm)
{
rcu_read_lock();
- if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
+ if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu(&q->q_usage_counter))
goto fail;
/*
--
2.33.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists