[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXF4914AczWoN8TK@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:28:07 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/42] x86/sev-es: initialize sev_status/features
within #VC handler
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:35:35PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Fortunately, all the code makes use of sev_status to get at the SEV MSR
> bits, so breaking the appropriate bits out of sme_enable() into an earlier
> sev_init() routine that's the exclusive writer of sev_status sounds like a
> promising approach.
Ack.
> It makes sense to do it immediately after the first #VC handler is set
> up, so CPUID is available, and since that's where SNP CPUID table
> initialization would need to happen if it's to be made available in
> #VC handler.
Right, and you can do all your init/CPUID prep there.
> It may even be similar enough between boot/compressed and run-time kernel
> that it could be a shared routine in sev-shared.c.
Uuh, bonus points! :-)
> But then again it also sounds like the appropriate place to move the
> snp_cpuid_init*() calls, and locating the cc_blob, and since there's
> differences there it might make sense to keep the boot/compressed and
> kernel proper sev_init() routines separate to avoid #ifdeffery).
>
> Not to get ahead of myself though. Just seems like a good starting point
> for how to consolidate the various users.
I like how you're thinking. :)
> Got it, and my apologies if I've given you that impression as it's
> certainly not my intent. (though I'm sure you've heard that before.)
Nothing to apologize - all good.
> Agreed, if we need to check SEV MSR early for the purposes of SNP it makes
> sense to move the overall SEV feature detection code earlier as well. I
> should have looked into that aspect more closely before introducing the
> changes.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists