[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXF/+jxRtjnlXU7w@myrica>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:58:02 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"lushenming@...wei.com" <lushenming@...wei.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"david@...son.dropbear.id.au" <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/20] iommu/iommufd: Add IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_INFO
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 02:26:00AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > I'll leave it to Jean to confirm. If only coherent DMA can be used in
> > the guest on other platforms, suppose VFIO should not blindly set
> > IOMMU_CACHE and in concept it should deny assigning a non-coherent
> > device since no co-ordination with guest exists today.
>
> Jean, what's your opinion?
Yes a sanity check to prevent assigning non-coherent devices would be
good, though I'm not particularly worried about non-coherent devices. PCIe
on Arm should be coherent (according to the Base System Architecture). So
vfio-pci devices should be coherent, but vfio-platform and mdev are
case-by-case (hopefully all coherent since it concerns newer platforms).
More worrying, I thought we disabled No-Snoop for VFIO but I was wrong,
it's left enabled. On Arm I don't think userspace can perform the right
cache maintenance operations to maintain coherency with a device that
issues No-Snoop writes. Userspace can issue clean+invalidate but not
invalidate alone, so there is no equivalent to arch_sync_dma_for_cpu().
I think the worse that can happen is the device owner shooting itself in
the foot by using No-Snoop, but would it hurt to disable it?
Thanks,
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists