linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXGH8Y/flJWCCrbt@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:32:01 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 01:39:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   126fe0401883 ("x86/fpu: Cleanup xstate xcomp_bv initialization")
> 
> from the tip tree and commits:
> 
>   5ebbc470d7f3 ("KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of CR0.ET for guests during vCPU create")
>   e8f65b9bb483 ("KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of XCR0 for guest during vCPU create")
>   583d369b36a9 ("KVM: x86: Fold fx_init() into kvm_arch_vcpu_create()")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 04350680b649,3ea4f6ef2474..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@@ -10615,10 -10687,10 +10590,9 @@@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcp
>   		pr_err("kvm: failed to allocate vcpu's fpu\n");
>   		goto free_user_fpu;
>   	}
>  -	fpstate_init(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu->state);
>  -	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
>  -		vcpu->arch.guest_fpu->state.xsave.header.xcomp_bv =
>  -			host_xcr0 | XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
>  +
>  +	fpu_init_fpstate_user(vcpu->arch.user_fpu);
>  +	fpu_init_fpstate_user(vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
> - 	fx_init(vcpu);
>   
>   	vcpu->arch.maxphyaddr = cpuid_query_maxphyaddr(vcpu);
>   	vcpu->arch.reserved_gpa_bits = kvm_vcpu_reserved_gpa_bits_raw(vcpu);

LGTM too, thx Stephen!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg