linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI fixes for v5.15-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whCammRsz8PEbrft3M6vGjF506gkxtyGw81uGOUUvD51g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:12:41 -1000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI fixes for v5.15-rc7

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:01 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>  - Fix an ACPI tools build issue introduced recently when the minimal
>    stdarg.h was added (Miguel Bernal Marin).

Hmm. ACPI already has that odd ACPI_USE_BUILTIN_STDARG case in
acgcc.h, which ends up using _exactly_ the same macros as the
<linux/stdarg.h> implementation does, and is basically exactly the
same "minimal stdarg".

Ok, so the macro argument names are different, and there are
whitespace differences, but semantically identical.

So maybe the ACPI code could drop one or the other in favor of the
identical macros?

                 Linus