[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+-6iNz3PMsYDds_uoh_xNoPop-tLn1O9U9wnTmTx+pZyN5ZFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:24:50 -0400
From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP
voltage regulators
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:49 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:06:54AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>
> > The use of a regulator property in the pcie EP subnode such as
> > "vpcie12v-supply" depends on a pending pullreq to the pci-bus.yaml
> > file at
> >
> > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/54
>
> This contains updates to add the generic PCIe supply rails, not the
> brcm-ep-a and brcm-ep-b supplies (which as I said on the other patch
> look like they ought to be renamed). That's fine since they're
> obviously not generic PCIe things but this means that those bindings
> need to be added to the device specific bindings here. Currently
> there's only an update to the examples.
Just to be clear, and assuming that the brcm-ep-[ab] supply names are
green-lighted by you and Rob, are you saying
I have to update the github site or our YAML file? If the latter, it
seems odd to be describing
an EP-device property in the YAML for an RC driver since the github
site already describes the EP-device.
Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists