linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] dm,dax,pmem: prepare dax_copy_to/from_iter() APIs with DAXDEV_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <600a0bb0-06a8-ea7d-47ad-c0e26b1c6668@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:30:28 +0000
From:   Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     "david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
        "djwong@...nel.org" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "vishal.l.verma@...el.com" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "dave.jiang@...el.com" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "agk@...hat.com" <agk@...hat.com>,
        "snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        "dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        "ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
        "vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dm,dax,pmem: prepare dax_copy_to/from_iter() APIs
 with DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY

On 10/21/2021 10:33 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:49:15AM +0000, Jane Chu wrote:
>> I've looked through your "futher decouple DAX from block devices" series
>> and likes the use of xarray in place of the host hash list.
>> Which upstream version is the series based upon?
>> If it's based on your development repo, I'd be happy to take a clone
>> and rebase my patches on yours if you provide a link. Please let me
>> know the best way to cooperate.
> 
> It is based on linux-next from when it was posted.  A git tree is here:
> 
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dax-block-cleanup
> 
>> That said, I'm unclear at what you're trying to suggest with respect
>> to the 'DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY' flag.  The flag came from upper dax-fs
>> call stack to the dm target layer, and the dm targets are equipped
>> with handling pmem driver specific task, so it appears that the flag
>> would need to be passed down to the native pmem layer, right?
>> Am I totally missing your point?
> 
> We'll need to pass it through (assuming we want to keep supporting
> dm, see the recent discussion with Dan).
> 
> FYI, here is a sketch where I'd like to move to, but this isn't properly
> tested yet:
> 
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dax-devirtualize
> 
> To support something like DAXDEV_F_RECOVERYwe'd need a separate
> dax_operations methods.  Which to me suggest it probably should be
> a different operation (fallocate / ioctl / etc) as Darrick did earlier.
> 

Thanks for the info!
-jane