linux-kernel - [for-next][PATCH 38/40] ARM: clang: Do not rely on lr register for stacktrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211022204845.186921923@goodmis.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:48:34 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 38/40] ARM: clang: Do not rely on lr register for stacktrace

From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Currently the stacktrace on clang compiled arm kernel uses the 'lr'
register to find the first frame address from pt_regs. However, that
is wrong after calling another function, because the 'lr' register
is used by 'bl' instruction and never be recovered.

As same as gcc arm kernel, directly use the frame pointer (r11) of
the pt_regs to find the first frame address.

Note that this fixes kretprobe stacktrace issue only with
CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER=y. For the CONFIG_UNWINDER_ARM,
we need another fix.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 76ea4178a55c..db798eac7431 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -54,8 +54,7 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
 
 	frame->sp = frame->fp;
 	frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp);
-	frame->pc = frame->lr;
-	frame->lr = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 4);
+	frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 4);
 #else
 	/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
 	if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
-- 
2.33.0