[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211022074551.ro22d7xj3idisvzv@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:15:51 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: opp: Allow multi-worded node names
On 22-10-21, 10:39, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> What we currently have for Tegra is a tegra-opps.dtsi and tegra.dtsi
> which includes the OPP's dtsi.
>
> the tegra-opps.dtsi has this structure:
>
> table: devname-opp-table {
> opp: ...
> };
>
> and tegra.dtsi:
>
> #include "tegra-opps.dtsi"
>
> device@...0 {
> operating-points-v2 = <&table>;
> };
>
> It just occurred to me that there is no need to move all tables to
> tegra.dtsi, but change structure of tegra-opps.dtsi to:
>
> device@...0 {
> operating-points-v2 = <&table>;
>
> table: opp-table {
> opp: ...
> };
> };
I thought you would have already thought about that and I was surprised when you
saw the tables are big enough to be moved. I was wondering what does it really
mean :)
> Then there no need to change current naming scheme. Let me try to
> implement it and see how it goes.
That's good then.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists