[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcoKYvbMpAmyDjkBtt1bL96RwSD0DYcb96hRO6n3aXe9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:57:24 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nehal Shah <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: Add stubs for wakeup handler functions
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 7:05 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
Thanks! My comments below.
> commit ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
The commit
> added new functions for drivers to use during the s2idle wakeup path, but
> didn't add stubs for when CONFIG_ACPI wasn't set.
>
> Add those stubs in for other drivers to be able to use.
...
> +static inline int acpi_register_wakeup_handler(
> + int wake_irq, bool (*wakeup)(void *context), void *context)
A bit of a strange indentation. Can wake_irq be on the previous line?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists