[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANBLGcysKdqo+FioSkhd1PZRLzPF=fRJrCTsUGR7vXcn2WpYHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:34:58 +0200
From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michael Zhu <michael.zhu@...rfivetech.com>,
Fu Wei <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] reset: starfive-jh7100: Add StarFive JH7100
reset driver
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:56, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:43 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk> wrote:
> > +static const u32 jh7100_reset_asserted[4] = {
>
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_U74 % 32) |
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_DRESET % 32) |
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_BRESET % 32),
>
> It's hard to notice that this is only one entry. See also below.
Yeah, so what would be a better way to style it?
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_DRESET % 32) |
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_BRESET % 32),
> > +
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_E24 % 32)
>
> + Comma.
>
> > +};
>
> Why all these ugly % 32 against constants?
Because the JH7100_RST_ values goes higher than 31. There is a
BIT_MASK macro, but that does % BITS_PER_LONG and this is a 64bit
machine.
> ...
>
> > + if (!assert)
> > + done ^= mask;
>
> Can you convert this to simple
>
> if (assert)
> ret = readl_...
> else
> ret = readl_...
>
> below?
I don't see how that would work. We're using the done value in in the
readl_poll_timeout. Maybe you can be a bit more explicit.
The reason is that for most reset lines a 0 in the status register
means it's asserted and a 1 means it's deasserted. For the few reset
lines above this is reversed though.
/Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists