linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH] drm/aperture: Add param to disable conflicting framebuffers removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:40:40 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
        Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/aperture: Add param to disable conflicting framebuffers removal

The simpledrm driver allows to use the frame buffer that was set-up by the
firmware. This gives early video output before the platform DRM driver is
probed and takes over.

But it would be useful to have a way to disable this take over by the real
DRM drivers. For example, there may be bugs in the DRM drivers that could
cause the display output to not work correctly.

For those cases, it would be good to keep the simpledrm driver instead and
at least get a working display as set-up by the firmware.

Let's add a drm.remove_fb boolean kernel command line parameter, that when
set to false will prevent the conflicting framebuffers to being removed.

Since the drivers call drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers() very
early in their probe callback, this will cause the drivers' probe to fail.

Thanks to Neal Gompa for the suggestion and Thomas Zimmermann for the idea
on how this could be implemented.

Suggested-by: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
---
Hello,

I'm sending this as an RFC because I wasn't sure about the correct name for
this module parameter, and also if 'remove_fb=0' is intitutive or instead a
parameter that's enabled is preferred (i.e: 'disable_fb_removal=1').

Best regards,
Javier

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
index 74bd4a76b253..0b454c8f7465 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
 #include <drm/drm_print.h>
 
+static bool drm_aperture_remove_fb = true;
+module_param_named(remove_fb, drm_aperture_remove_fb, bool, 0600);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(remove_fb,
+		 "Allow conflicting framebuffers removal [default=true]");
+
 /**
  * DOC: overview
  *
@@ -283,6 +288,9 @@ static void drm_aperture_detach_drivers(resource_size_t base, resource_size_t si
  * This function removes graphics device drivers which use memory range described by
  * @base and @size.
  *
+ * The conflicting framebuffers removal can be disabled by setting the drm.remove_fb=0 kernel
+ * command line option. When this is disabled, the function will return an -EINVAL errno code.
+ *
  * Returns:
  * 0 on success, or a negative errno code otherwise
  */
@@ -292,7 +300,12 @@ int drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(resource_size_t base, resource_
 #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FB)
 	struct apertures_struct *a;
 	int ret;
+#endif
+
+	if (!drm_aperture_remove_fb)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
+#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FB)
 	a = alloc_apertures(1);
 	if (!a)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -322,6 +335,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers);
  * for any of @pdev's memory bars. The function assumes that PCI device with
  * shadowed ROM drives a primary display and so kicks out vga16fb.
  *
+ * The conflicting framebuffers removal can be disabled by setting the drm.remove_fb=0 kernel
+ * command line option. When this is disabled, the function will return an -EINVAL errno code.
+ *
  * Returns:
  * 0 on success, or a negative errno code otherwise
  */
@@ -331,6 +347,9 @@ int drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	resource_size_t base, size;
 	int bar, ret = 0;
 
+	if (!drm_aperture_remove_fb)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; ++bar) {
 		if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM))
 			continue;
-- 
2.31.1