[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXLPZ4CsQMjHPpJS@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:49:11 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP
voltage regulators
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:06:54AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> The use of a regulator property in the pcie EP subnode such as
> "vpcie12v-supply" depends on a pending pullreq to the pci-bus.yaml
> file at
>
> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/54
This contains updates to add the generic PCIe supply rails, not the
brcm-ep-a and brcm-ep-b supplies (which as I said on the other patch
look like they ought to be renamed). That's fine since they're
obviously not generic PCIe things but this means that those bindings
need to be added to the device specific bindings here. Currently
there's only an update to the examples.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists