lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0eab7a31-53e0-2899-76d7-3e9c0be76fad@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:31:03 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     fwilhelm@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, oupton@...gle.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: SEV-ES: clean up kvm_sev_es_ins/outs

On 22/10/21 01:14, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>   
>>   	vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
> ^^^
> I wonder what the rules are for clearing vcpu->arch.pio.count for userspace PIO vm exits.
> Looks like complete_fast_pio_out clears it, but otherwise the only other place
> that clears it in this case is x86_emulate_instruction when it restarts the instuction.
> Do I miss something?

For IN, it is cleared by the completion callback.

For OUT, it can be cleared either by the completion callback or before 
calling it, because the completion callback will not need it.  I would 
like to standardize towards clearing it in the callback for out, too, 
even if sometimes it's unnecessary to have a callback in the first 
place; this is what patch 8 does for example.  This way 
vcpu->arch.pio.count > 0 tells you whether the other fields have a 
recent value.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ