linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:06:45 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:19:40PM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:44 PM Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> >
> > However, with MTE doing both get_user() every 16 bytes and
> > gup can get pretty expensive.
> 
> So I really think that anything that is performance-critical had
> better only do the "fault_in_write()" code path in the cold error path
> where you took a page fault.
[...]
> So I wouldn't worry too much about the performance concerns. It simply
> shouldn't be a common or hot path.
> 
> And yes, I've seen code that does that "fault_in_xyz()" before the
> critical operation that cannot take page faults, and does it
> unconditionally.
> 
> But then it isn't the "fault_in_xyz()" that should be blamed if it is
> slow, but the caller that does things the wrong way around.

Some more thinking out loud. I did some unscientific benchmarks on a
Raspberry Pi 4 with the filesystem in a RAM block device and a
"dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test" writing 512MB in 1MB blocks. I changed
fault_in_readable() in linux-next to probe every 16 bytes:

- ext4 drops from around 261MB/s to 246MB/s: 5.7% penalty

- btrfs drops from around 360MB/s to 337MB/s: 6.4% penalty

For generic_perform_write() Dave Hansen attempted to move the fault-in
after the uaccess in commit 998ef75ddb57 ("fs: do not prefault
sys_write() user buffer pages"). This was reverted as it was exposing an
ext4 bug. I don't whether it was fixed but re-applying Dave's commit
avoids the performance drop.

btrfs_buffered_write() has a comment about faulting pages in before
locking them in prepare_pages(). I suspect it's a similar problem and
the fault_in() could be moved, though I can't say I understand this code
well enough.

Probing only the first byte(s) in fault_in() would be ideal, no need to
go through all filesystems and try to change the uaccess/probing order.

-- 
Catalin