linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: rc: pwm-ir-tx: Switch to atomic PWM API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:50:56 +0100
From:   Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To:     Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rc: pwm-ir-tx: Switch to atomic PWM API

Hi Maíra,

Your patch looks good, just some very minor nits.

On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 02:22:46PM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
> replace it for the atomic PWM API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>
> ---
>  drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> index 4bc28d2c9cc9..dfaa6125991e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
>  {
>  	struct pwm_ir *pwm_ir = dev->priv;
>  	struct pwm_device *pwm = pwm_ir->pwm;
> +	struct pwm_state state;
>  	int i, duty, period;
>  	ktime_t edge;
>  	long delta;
> @@ -60,15 +61,19 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
>  	period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(NSEC_PER_SEC, pwm_ir->carrier);
>  	duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(pwm_ir->duty_cycle * period, 100);
>  
> -	pwm_config(pwm, duty, period);
> +	pwm_init_state(pwm, &state);
> +
> +	state.duty_cycle = duty;
> +	state.period = period;

There is no reason to have the period and duty local variables any more;
the result of DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(..) can be assigned directly.

>  	edge = ktime_get();
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>  		if (i % 2) // space
> -			pwm_disable(pwm);
> +			state.enabled = false;
>  		else
> -			pwm_enable(pwm);
> +			state.enabled = true;

This could be simply:
		state.enabled = (i % 2) == 0;

> +		pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
>  
>  		edge = ktime_add_us(edge, txbuf[i]);
>  		delta = ktime_us_delta(edge, ktime_get());
> @@ -76,7 +81,8 @@ static int pwm_ir_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *txbuf,
>  			usleep_range(delta, delta + 10);
>  	}
>  
> -	pwm_disable(pwm);
> +	state.enabled = false;
> +	pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
>  
>  	return count;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.31.1

Thanks
Sean