lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 22:25:17 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 02/19] trace/osnoise: Split workload start from the
 tracer start

On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:56:40 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:

> +/*
> + * osnoise_workload_stop - stop the workload and unhook the events
> + */
> +static void osnoise_workload_stop(void)
> +{
> +	if (!osnoise_busy)
> +		return;
> +
> +	trace_osnoise_callback_enabled = false;

I know this is just moving this code, but the original code had this
issue too, but there should be a comment here to why we need the
compiler barrier.

-- Steve


> +	barrier();
> +
> +	stop_per_cpu_kthreads();
> +
> +	unhook_irq_events();
> +	unhook_softirq_events();
> +	unhook_thread_events();
> +
> +	osnoise_busy = false;
> +}
> +

Powered by blists - more mailing lists