[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211022224711.7d1cbddf@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 22:47:11 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/19] trace/osnoise: Allow multiple instances of the
same tracer
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:56:43 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> Allow more than one instance of the same tracer. The workload will
> start when the first trace_array (instance) is registered and will
> stop when the last instance is unregistered.
>
> Osnoise and timerlat are still mutually exclusive because of the
> different behavior of the osnoise: tracepoints.
I don't understand what the above means, or how it is relative to this
commit?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists