[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab177213e7aa808b3803cac46146d96a02724425.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 15:07:12 +0800
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Eddie Hung <eddie.hung@...iatek.com>,
Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM / wakeirq: support enabling wake-up irq after
runtime_suspend called
On Sat, 2021-10-23 at 14:35 +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 17:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:05 AM Chunfeng Yun <
> > chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > When the dedicated wake-irq is level trigger, and it uses the
> > > consumer's sleep status as the wakeup source, that means if the
> > > consumer is not in sleep state, the wake-irq will be triggered
> > > when enable it; For this case, need enable the wake-irq after
> > > invoking the consumer's runtime_suspend() which make the consumer
> > > enter sleep state.
> > [...]
>
> If want to make it static, should move it from wakeirq.c into
> runtime.c
>
> >
> > > {
> > > struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
> > >
> > > if (!wirq || !(wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK))
> > > return;
> >
> > And I would just add the following line here:
> >
> > if (cond_disable && (wirq->status &
> > WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_LATE_ENABLED))
> > return;
>
> This change doesn't cover the case (WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_LATE_ENABLED
> and
> WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED are both set 1):
>
> -->rpm_suspend(): wirq->irq is enabled
> -->rpm_resume(): disable wirq->irq; (if change it, doesn't disable
> wirq->irq)
Seems I'm wrong, check again.
>
> >
> > >
> > > - if (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED)
> > > + if (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED &&
> > > + (skip_late_enabled_status ||
> > > + !(wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_LATE_ENABLED)))
> > > disable_irq_nosync(wirq->irq);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_complete - enable wake irq based on
> > > status
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists