linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: allow 0 as num_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Oct 2021 11:11:51 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: allow 0 as num_request_queues

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 05:19:33PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> On 10/24/2021 4:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > The default value is 0 meaning "no limit". However if 0
> > is specified on the command line it is instead silently
> > converted to 1. Further, the value is already validated
> > at point of use, there's no point in duplicating code
> > validating the value when it is set.
> > 
> > Simplify the code while making the behaviour more consistent
> > by using plain module_param.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1a662cf6cb9a ("virtio-blk: add num_request_queues module parameter")
> > Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 14 +-------------
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > index 6318134aab76..c336d9bb9105 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > @@ -30,20 +30,8 @@
> >   #define VIRTIO_BLK_INLINE_SG_CNT	2
> >   #endif
> > -static int virtblk_queue_count_set(const char *val,
> > -		const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > -{
> > -	return param_set_uint_minmax(val, kp, 1, nr_cpu_ids);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static const struct kernel_param_ops queue_count_ops = {
> > -	.set = virtblk_queue_count_set,
> > -	.get = param_get_uint,
> > -};
> > -
> >   static unsigned int num_request_queues;
> > -module_param_cb(num_request_queues, &queue_count_ops, &num_request_queues,
> > -		0644);
> > +module_param(num_request_queues, uint, 0644);
> 
> Not the best solution.
> 
> You can set the param to 1024 but in practice nr_cpu_ids can be 32 for
> example.

Well your patch does make it possible to know what nr_cpu_ids is.
But does it matter? The actual number of queues is still capped
by the num_queues of the device. And I'm concerned that some
userspace comes to depend on reading back nr_cpu_ids
from there, which will cement this as part of ABI instead of
being an implementation detail.
Exposing the actual number of queues in sysfs might make more sense ...

Generally you suggested embedded as a use-case, and I don't really
see lots of embedded userspace poking at this parameter in sysfs.

What I'd like to see, and attempted to achieve here:
- avoid code duplication
- consistency: some way to specify the parameter but still make it have the default value

Better suggestions are welcome.

> 
> >   MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_request_queues,
> >   		 "Limit the number of request queues to use for blk device. "
> >   		 "0 for no limit. "