[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211024152745.GD4721@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:27:45 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Maciej Rozycki <macro@...am.me.uk>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] signal/mips: Update (_save|_restore)_fp_context to
fail with -EFAULT
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:43:51PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> When an instruction to save or restore a register from the stack fails
> in _save_fp_context or _restore_fp_context return with -EFAULT. This
> change was made to r2300_fpu.S[1] but it looks like it got lost with
> the introduction of EX2[2]. This is also what the other implementation
> of _save_fp_context and _restore_fp_context in r4k_fpu.S does, and
> what is needed for the callers to be able to handle the error.
>
> Furthermore calling do_exit(SIGSEGV) from bad_stack is wrong because
> it does not terminate the entire process it just terminates a single
> thread.
>
> As the changed code was the only caller of arch/mips/kernel/syscall.c:bad_stack
> remove the problematic and now unused helper function.
>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> Cc: Maciej Rozycki <macro@...am.me.uk>
> Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
> [1] 35938a00ba86 ("MIPS: Fix ISA I FP sigcontext access violation handling")
> [2] f92722dc4545 ("MIPS: Correct MIPS I FP sigcontext layout")
> Fixes: f92722dc4545 ("MIPS: Correct MIPS I FP sigcontext layout")
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/r2300_fpu.S | 4 ++--
> arch/mips/kernel/syscall.c | 9 ---------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists