[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXXNa4FcvbGfCrxr@zn.tnic>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 23:17:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/23] x86/arch_prctl: Add controls for dynamic XSTATE
components
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 03:55:10PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> +/**
> + * fpu_xstate_prctl - xstate permission operations
> + * @tsk: Redundant pointer to current
> + * @option: A subfunction of arch_prctl()
> + * @arg2: option argument
> + * Return: 0 if successful; otherwise, an error code
> + *
> + * Option arguments:
> + *
> + * ARCH_GET_XCOMP_SUPP: Pointer to user space u64 to store the info
> + * ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM: Pointer to user space u64 to store the info
> + * ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM: Facility number requested
> + *
> + * For facilities which require more than one XSTATE component, the request
> + * must be the highest state component number related to that facility,
> + * e.g. for AMX which requires XFEATURE_XTILE_CFG(17) and
> + * XFEATURE_XTILE_DATA(18) this would be XFEATURE_XTILE_DATA(18).
> + */
Can I pls get this new set of prctl()s documented properly ontop of this
patchset?
I guess Documentation/x86/xstate.rst or so.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists