[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTTevdrtqphqtHDx1pmypwjUSG7fZz5Znr-iDNsn1QNu3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:35:02 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] dt-bindings: update riscv plic compatible string
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 5:18 PM Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 2:31 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:35 PM Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 7:03 AM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > >
> > > > Add the compatible string "thead,c900-plic" to the riscv plic
> > > > bindings to support allwinner d1 SOC which contains c906 core.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > > Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> > > > Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> > > > Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes since V5:
> > > > - Add DT list
> > > > - Fixup compatible string
> > > > - Remove allwinner-d1 compatible
> > > > - make dt_binding_check
> > > >
> > > > Changes since V4:
> > > > - Update description in errata style
> > > > - Update enum suggested by Anup, Heiko, Samuel
> > > >
> > > > Changes since V3:
> > > > - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> > > > - Add thead,c900-plic in the description section
> > > > ---
> > > > .../interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> > > > index 08d5a57ce00f..18b97bfd7954 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> > > > @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ description:
> > > > contains a specific memory layout, which is documented in chapter 8 of the
> > > > SiFive U5 Coreplex Series Manual <https://static.dev.sifive.com/U54-MC-RVCoreIP.pdf>.
> > > >
> > > > + The thead,c900-plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has been disabled in
> > > > + enable register. Add thead_plic_chip which fix up c906-plic irq source completion
> > > > + problem by unmask/mask wrapper.
> > > > +
> > >
> > > This is an incomplete description about how T-HEAD PLIC is different from
> > > RISC-V PLIC.
> > >
> > > I would suggest the following:
> > >
> > > The T-HEAD C9xx SoC implements a modified/custom T-HEAD PLIC specification
> > > which will mask current IRQ upon read to CLAIM register and will unmask the IRQ
> > > upon write to CLAIM register. The thead,c900-plic compatible string
> > > represents the
> > > custom T-HEAD PLIC specification.
> > The patch fixup the problem that when "thead,c900-plic" couldn't
> > complete masked irq source which has been disabled.
> >
> > This patch is different from the last one in that there is no
> > relationship with the auto-mask feature.
>
> This patch adds compatible string for T-HEAD PLIC so it
> should describe how T-HEAD PLIC is different from RISC-V
> PLIC. The DT bindings document describes HW and not
> the software work-around implemented using DT bindings.
>
> Your irqchip patch uses T-HEAD PLIC compatible string to
> implement a work-around.
>
> In other words, this patch is different from the irqchip patch.
How about below:
The thead,c900-plic compatible string represents the custom T-HEAD
PLIC specification.
- It couldn't complete masked irq source which has been disabled in
enable register. Add thead_plic_chip which fix up c906-plic irq source
completion problem by unmask/mask wrapper.
- It implements a modified/custom T-HEAD PLIC specification which
will mask current IRQ upon read to CLAIM register and will unmask the
IRQ upon write to CLAIM register. But the feature wasn't utilized by
software.
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Anup
> > >
> > > > maintainers:
> > > > - Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
> > > > - Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
> > > > @@ -42,11 +46,16 @@ maintainers:
> > > >
> > > > properties:
> > > > compatible:
> > > > - items:
> > > > + oneOf:
> > > > + - items:
> > > > - enum:
> > > > - - sifive,fu540-c000-plic
> > > > - - canaan,k210-plic
> > > > + - sifive,fu540-c000-plic
> > > > + - canaan,k210-plic
> > > > - const: sifive,plic-1.0.0
> > > > + - items:
> > > > + - enum:
> > > > + - allwinner,sun20i-d1-plic
> > > > + - const: thead,c900-plic
> > > >
> > > > reg:
> > > > maxItems: 1
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Guo Ren
> >
> > ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists